Publication:
Status of countrywide laboratory services quality and capacity in primary healthcare facilities in Tanzania: Findings from Star Rating Assessment

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKinyenje, Erick
dc.contributor.authorNgowi, Ruth R.
dc.contributor.authorMsigwa, Yohanes S.
dc.contributor.authorHokororo, Joseph C.
dc.contributor.authorYahya, Talhiya A.
dc.contributor.authorGerman, Chrisogone J.
dc.contributor.authorMawazo, Akili
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Mohamed A.
dc.contributor.authorNassoro, Omary A.
dc.contributor.authorDegeh, Mbwana M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T12:01:31Z
dc.date.available2024-08-19T12:01:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-18
dc.description.abstractAccurate disease diagnosis relies on a well-organized and reliable laboratory system. This study assesses the quality of laboratory services in Tanzania based on the nationwide Star Rating Assessment (SRA) of Primary Healthcare (PHC) facilities conducted in 2017/18. This cross-sectional study utilized secondary data from all the country’s PHC facilities stored in the SRA database. Laboratory service quality was assessed by aggregating scores as percentages of the maximum achievable score across various indicators: dedicated laboratory department/room, adequate equipment, staffing levels, adherence to testing protocols, establishment of turnaround times, internal and external quality controls, and safety and supplies management. Scores equal to or exceeding 80% were deemed compliant. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the influence of facility characteristics (level, ownership, location, staffing) on quality scores, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The study included 6,663 PHC facilities (85.9% dispensaries, 11% health centers, 3.2% hospital-level-1), with the majority being public (82.3% vs. 17.7%) and located in rural areas (77.1% vs. 22.9%). On average, facilities scored 30.8% (SD = 35.7), and only 26.6% met staffing requirements. Compliance with quality standards was higher in private (63% vs. 19%, p<0.001) and urban facilities (62% vs. 16%, p<0.001). More than half of the facilities did not meet either of the eight quality indicators. Quality was positively linked to staffing compliance (Beta = 5.770) but negatively impacted by dispensaries (Beta = -6.342), rural locations (Beta = -0.945), and public ownership (Beta = -1.459). A score of 30% falls significantly short of the national target of 80%. Improving laboratory staffing levels at PHC facilities could improve the quality of laboratory services, especially in public facilities that are based in rural areas. There is a need to further strengthen laboratory services in PHC facilities to ensure the quality of laboratory services and clients’ satisfaction.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001489
dc.identifier.urihttps://erepository.mku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6183
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPlos Global Public Health
dc.titleStatus of countrywide laboratory services quality and capacity in primary healthcare facilities in Tanzania: Findings from Star Rating Assessment
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pgph.0001489.pdf
Size:
459.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Department of Health Management and Informatics