Thesis:

Influence of monitoring and evaluation practices on the performance of non-governmental organizations in the agricultural sector: a case of the Kenya national farmer’s federation

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) play a vital role in enhancing the performance and effectiveness of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), especially within the agricultural sector, which significantly contributes to economic growth, food security, employment, and GDP (Ciucescu and Feraru, 2014). This study focused on analyzing how M&E practices influence the performance of NGOs in agriculture, specifically examining the Kenya National Farmers’ Federation (KENAFF). The study’s objectives were to assess the impact of the frequency of M&E data collection, stakeholder engagement in M&E, and the integration of local knowledge in M&E on KENAFF’s performance. A descriptive research approach was employed to investigate the influence of M&E practices on KENAFF. The target population included 140 M&E staff and 60 stakeholders, resulting in a sample size of 134 respondents. The study utilized a mix of probability and non-probability sampling methods, with simple random sampling applied for M&E staff. Data collection tools included surveys with closed and open-ended questions and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) targeting M&E managerial and operational staff, stakeholder representatives, and grassroots stakeholders. To ensure validity and reliability, content validity assessments were conducted, and Cronbach’s Alpha tested the questionnaire’s internal consistency. Data was analyzed using SPSS, where descriptive statistics like means, standard deviations, and frequencies were used to summarize findings. The research provides insights into how M&E practices at KENAFF can enhance organizational performance, ultimately benefiting farmers supported by the organization. The findings revealed mixed views among respondents. Many were neutral or slightly dissatisfied with the frequency of M&E data collection per agricultural season, indicating some uncertainty about data adequacy. Similarly, respondents were generally neutral regarding the sufficiency of stakeholder engagement and local practices integrated into KENAFF programs, suggesting a need for potential improvements. Conversely, respondents expressed strong satisfaction with KENAFF’s financial performance, indicating that the organization’s overall outcomes were well-regarded. In conclusion, the study highlights diverse perspectives on M&E practices at KENAFF, particularly concerning data collection frequency, stakeholder engagement, and the incorporation of local knowledge. The findings suggest that stakeholder engagement and local knowledge integration could be areas for further enhancement. The study recommends that KENAFF continue with its current practices but also pursue qualitative feedback to explore subtle areas for improvement. Additionally, efforts should be made to diversify stakeholder representation to improve inclusivity, and the organization should continually evaluate and enhance the integration of local practices into its M&E framework. These recommendations aim to foster stronger stakeholder connections, improve M&E practices, and contribute to KENAFF’s goal of supporting agricultural development and improving farmer livelihoods. Further research could examine the types of data collected influence decision-making processes in agricultural NGOs. Explore best practices and innovative methods for integrating local agricultural practices in a way that strengthens both program relevance and outcomes in KENAFF.